>>If you strike the parenthical verbage from Joseph's post, it reads as nothing more than the SEC responding to a complaint.
That may indeed be the case if you take out that sentence. But how exactly would you explain the incorrect case ref#? The SEC internal system can't get the case#s correct?
I think it's pretty clear what Joey was trying to do...
"Q: What’s special about the lifting gas technology? . . . How long will it take for a Stratellite to reach cruising altitude? A: The lifting gas technology is proprietary." -Sanwire Networks, LLC
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.