UnifiedOnline Inc fka UOIP

[long uoip]

145 SCHEDULING ORDER: Fact Discovery completed by 11/21/2022. Opening Expert Reports due by 12/21/2022. Rebuttal Expert Reports due by 1/20/2023. Reply Expert Reports due by 2/3/2023. Expert Discovery due by 3/20/2023. A Pretrial Conference is set for 7/10/2023 at 04:30 PM in Courtroom 4A before Judge Maryellen Noreika. A 3-day Bench Trial is set for 7/17/2023 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4A before Judge Maryellen Noreika. Signed by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 8/25/2022. (dlw)

3 day bench trial beginning at 8:30 a.m. on July 17th, 2023

Aug 25, 2022

Main Doc­ument

Scheduling Order - General

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
CBV, INC.,
Plaintiff
v.
CHANBOND, LLC,
Defendant
and
DIERDRE LEANE and IPNAV, LLC,
Defendants.
C.A. No. 1:21-cv-01456-MN
SCHEDULING ORDER
This _______ day of _________________, 2022, the Court having conducted an initial
Rule 16(b) scheduling conference pursuant to Local Rule 16.1(b), and the parties having
determined after discussion that the matter cannot be resolved at this juncture by settlement,
voluntary mediation, or binding arbitration;
IT IS ORDERED that:
1. Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosures and E-Discovery Default Standard. The parties
shall make their initial disclosures pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1) within
five (5) days from the date the Court enters this Order. If they have not already done so, the
parties are to review the Court's Default Standard for Discovery, Including Discovery of
Electronically Stored Information ("ESI"), which is posted at http://www.ded.uscourts.gov (see
Other Resources, Default Standard for Discovery) and is incorporated herein by reference.
2. Application to Court for Protective Order. Should counsel find it will be necessary
to apply to the Court for a protective order specifying terms and conditions for the disclosure of
confidential information, counsel should confer and attempt to reach an agreement on a proposed
form of order and submit it to the Court within five (5) days from the date the Court enters this
Order. Should counsel be unable to reach an agreement on a proposed form of order, counsel
must follow the provisions of Paragraph 7(g) below.
Any proposed protective order must include the following paragraph:
Other Proceedings. By entering this order and limiting the
disclosure of information in this case, the Court does not intend to
preclude another court from finding that information may be
relevant and subject to disclosure in another case. Any person or
party subject to this order who becomes subject to a motion to
disclose another party's information designated "confidential" [the
parties should list any other level of designation, such as "highly
confidential," which may be provided for in the protective order]
pursuant to this order shall promptly notify that party of the motion
so that the party may have an opportunity to appear and be heard on
whether that information should be disclosed.
3. Papers Filed Under Seal. In accordance with section G of the Revised
Administrative Procedures Governing Filing and Service by Electronic Means, a redacted version
of any sealed document shall be filed electronically within seven (7) days of the filing of the sealed
document.
4. Courtesy Copies. The parties shall provide to the Court two (2) courtesy copies of
all briefs and any other document filed in support of any briefs (i.e., appendices, exhibits,
declarations, affidavits etc.). This provision also applies to papers filed under seal. All courtesy
copies shall be double-sided.
5. ADR Process. This matter is QRWreferred to a magistrate judge to explore the possibility
of alternative dispute resolution with a magistrate judge.
6. Discovery.
(a) Discovery Cut Off. All discovery in this case shall be initiated so that it
will be completed on or before November 21, 2022.
(b) Cross-Use of Discovery. The parties hereby agree that any discovery taken
in the arbitration referenced in the Complaint shall be deemed to have been taken in this action,
and Defendants shall expeditiously provide Plaintiff with copies of any discovery requests, written
discovery responses, documents, and deposition transcripts exchanged or taken in that arbitration.
(c) Document Production. Document production shall be substantially
complete by October 3, 2022.
(d) Requests for Admission. Absent good cause, a maximum of Twenty (20)
requests for admission are permitted for each side.
(e) Interrogatories.
i. Absent good cause, a maximum of Twenty (20) interrogatories,
including contention interrogatories, are permitted for each side.
ii. The Court encourages the parties to serve and respond to contention
interrogatories early in the case. In the absence of agreement among the parties, contention
interrogatories, if filed, shall first be addressed by the party with the burden of proof. The adequacy
of all interrogatory answers shall be judged by the level of detail each party provides (i.e., the more
detail a party provides, the more detail a party shall receive).
(f) Depositions.
i. Limitation on Hours for Deposition Discovery. Each side is limited
to a total of Thirty-Five (35) hours of taking testimony by deposition upon oral examination.
ii. Location of Depositions. Any party or representative (officer,
director, or managing agent) of a party filing a civil action in this district court must ordinarily be
required, upon request, to submit to a deposition at a place designated within this district.
Exceptions to this general rule may be made by order of the Court. A defendant who becomes a
counterclaimant, cross-claimant, or third-party plaintiff shall be considered as having filed an
action in this Court for the purpose of this provision.
(g) Disclosure of Expert Testimony.
i. Identification of Experts. The Parties shall disclose the identity of
any proposed affirmative expert they intend to use on a given subject matter, regardless of which
party has the initial burden of proof on that subject matter, on October 21, 2022. The disclosure
shall include the identity and CV of the expert, for conflicts purposes, and a general description of
the intended subject matter of the expert’s report. The identity and CV of any rebuttal expert shall
be disclosed on November 20, 2022.
ii. Expert Reports. For the party who has the initial burden of proof on
the subject matter, the initial Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) disclosure of expert
testimony is due on or before December 21, 2022. The supplemental disclosure to contradict or
rebut evidence on the same matter identified by another party is due on or before January 20,
2023. Reply expert reports from the party with the initial burden of proof are due on or before
February 3, 2023. No other expert reports will be permitted without either the consent of all
parties or leave of the Court. Along with the submissions of the expert reports, the parties shall
advise of the dates and times of their experts’ availability for deposition.
iii. Objections to Expert Testimony. To the extent any objection to
expert testimony is made pursuant to the principles announced in Daubert v. Merrell Dow.
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), as incorporated in Federal Rule of Evidence 702, it
shall be made by motion no later than fourteen (14) days after the close of expert discovery,
unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Briefing will be presented pursuant to the Court’s Local
Rules.
iv. Expert Discovery Cut Off. All expert discovery in this case shall be
initiated so that it will be completed on or before March 20, 2023.
(h) Discovery Matters and Disputes Relating to Protective Orders.
i. Any discovery motion filed without first complying with the
following procedures will be denied without prejudice to renew pursuant to these procedures.
ii. Should counsel find, after a reasonable effort pursuant to Local
Rule 7.1.1 that they are unable to resolve a discovery matter or a dispute relating to a protective
order, the parties involved in the discovery matter or protective order dispute shall contact the
Court's Judicial Administrator to schedule an argument.
iii. On a date to be set by separate order, generally not less than four (4)
days prior to the conference, the party seeking relief shall file with the Court a letter, not to exceed
three (3) pages, outlining the issues in dispute and its position on those issues. On a date to be set
by separate order, but generally not less than three (3) days prior to the conference, any party
opposing the application for relief may file a letter, not to exceed three (3) pages, outlining that
party's reasons for its opposition.
iv. The parties shall provide to the Court two (2) courtesy copies of its
discovery letter and any other document filed in support of any letter (i.e., appendices, exhibits,
declarations, affidavits etc.). This provision also applies to papers filed under seal. All courtesy
copies shall be double-sided.
v. Should the Court find further briefing necessary upon conclusion of
the conference, the Court will order it. Alternatively, the Court may choose to resolve the dispute
prior to the conference and will, in that event, cancel the conference.
7. Motions to Amend / Motions to Strike.
(a) Any motion to amend (including a motion for leave to amend) a pleading
or any motion to strike any pleading or other document shall be made pursuant to the discovery
dispute procedure set forth in Paragraph 7(g) above.
(b) Any such motion shall attach the proposed amended pleading as well as a
"redline" comparison to the prior pleading or attach the document to be stricken.
8. Case Dispositive Motions.
9. Applications by Motion. Except as otherwise specified herein, any application to
the Court shall be by written motion. Any non-dispositive motion should contain the statement
required by Local Rule 7.1.1.
10. Motions in Limine. Motions in limine shall not be separately filed. All in limine
requests and responses thereto shall be set forth in the proposed pretrial order. Each party shall be
limited to three (3) in limine requests, unless otherwise permitted by the Court. The in limine
request and any response shall contain the authorities relied upon; each in limine request may be
supported by a maximum of three (3) pages of argument, may be opposed by a maximum of three
(3) pages of argument, and the party making the in limine request may add a maximum of one (1)
additional page in reply in support of its request. If more than one party is supporting or opposing
an in limine request, such support or opposition shall be combined in a single three (3) page
submission (and, if the moving party, a single one (1) page reply), unless otherwise ordered by the
Court. No separate briefing shall be submitted on in limine requests, unless otherwise permitted
by the Court.
11. Pretrial Conference. On July 10th, 2023, the Court will hold a pretrial conference
in Court with counsel beginning at 4:30pm The parties shall file with the Court the joint
proposed final pretrial order in compliance with Local Rule 16.3(c) and the Court's
Preferences and Procedures for Civil Cases not later than seven (7) days before the pretrial
conference. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, the parties shall comply with the
timeframes set forth in Local Rule 16.3(d)(1)-(3) for the preparation of the joint proposed final
pretrial order. The Court will advise the parties at or before the above-scheduled pretrial
conference whether an additional pretrial conference will be necessary.
The parties shall provide the Court two (2) double-sided courtesy copies of the joint
proposed final pretrial order and all attachments. The proposed final pretrial order shall contain a
table of contents.
12. Trial. This matter is scheduled for a 3 day bench trial beginning at 8:30 a.m. on
July 17th, 2023, with the subsequent trial days beginning at 8:30 a.m. The trial will be timed, as
counsel will be allocated a total number of hours in which to present their respective cases.
__________________________
The Honorable Maryellen Noreika
United States District Judge

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ded.76834/gov.uscourts.ded.76834.145.0.pdf