InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 130
Posts 18112
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/16/2007

Re: None

Sunday, 02/11/2007 11:55:05 AM

Sunday, February 11, 2007 11:55:05 AM

Post# of 63795
Forbes Article

The Forbes article is no big deal. First of all, consider the source. Read the message I posted on the author, Dan Fisher. It reveals his questionable ethics in the past. Some writers will say anything to further their personal agenda.

The Rivera Process is a "Disruptive Technology". Many big oil companies stand to lose not just millions, but billions of dollars. They will resist USSE in any way they can. Investors here better accept that, becuase it is reality. Forbes is a well known magazine with many ties to existing Fortune 500 companies. These Fortune 500 companies are big advertisers in Forbes and have other ties and influence with Forbes. This is also reality.

The Forbes article itself. The author is very skeptical and biased throughout. The lead company is USSE, and the author is not especially critical of USSE, as much as the other companies. He questions the Rivera Process, yet provides no research or proof to his doubts. His biggest defense is some scientist that states something like "I just do not see how they can make that much biodiesel". Did either of these people research USSE? apparently, not. Did either visit the Natchez plant to research their vague insinuations? No. This is "Yellow Journalism at it's best.

The article is no big deal. Several here keep bringing it up and making ludicrous predictions. Some even pose as Longs. They are nothing more than Subtle Bashers. Bashers do not bash bad companies. Instead of discussing pertinent DD about USSE, this board has been led by a few self serving indivuals to waste their time here debating some inconsequential magazine article. Relax and let USSE execute.

.