InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 12
Posts 1600
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/08/2006

Re: satter post# 238481

Friday, 07/29/2022 6:09:58 PM

Friday, July 29, 2022 6:09:58 PM

Post# of 241032
So in Eric's latest tweet, he claims he doesn't have to give us the names of any contracts or the value of the contracts. Why would any company or hospital object to their name being used in a PR or tweet? The only way we get stock appreciation is in spite of Eric, not because of Eric. His tweets are rambling and disingenuous and that is why the stock is sitting at its 52 week low. If you notice, Vincent has not tweeted since June 27th and according to Eric, we have had two contracts since then. So why is Vincent not talking about these two contracts? We really need a CEO who does not have an ego so big that he treats shareholders in a very shabby way.

So I ask all these posters who keep saying what a great job Eric is doing, please tell me why the stock is near its 52 week low.

It is amazing to me that a CEO of a publicly traded company has to get permission for lawyers or customers. These are legal contracts and I can see no reason why there should be a stigma attached to naming the company and the value of the contract to that company.