Simply Politics & News

[eaglesurvivor]

Razorbucks I have not lost it, so please don't be silly with me. Did you forget this post to you? http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=16640041
Now, one might opine that I was being a bit hard on you. What was your response? http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=16640313

Razorbucks, you will notice that you did NOT SPECIFICALLY ADDRESS MY POINT. You made an issue and point about being specific. You have to right to do so and I think you have a reasonable expectation, in a civil debate, to have points addressed that way. I was VERY specific and you gave a broad answer that never addressed the very specific point: 1. One needs a passport to reenter the jurisdictional parameters of The United States of America.

Now this was part one of an aspect of the right to travel; not privilege. For your assistance, I cited case law. Remember that I hold to the rule of law. This distinguishes the federal government formed by The Constitution and my personal beliefs from that of an anarchist (No matter how sincere that individual's beliefs and practices are, but that's for a different discussion.).

So the ball is in your court. If you want to have this debate, then please civilly answer my point with specificity and I will bring forth more lost liberties. You will have to admit that I am attempting to answer your challenge, so how about equity?