InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 44
Posts 801
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/25/2020

Re: None

Wednesday, 07/27/2022 4:15:54 PM

Wednesday, July 27, 2022 4:15:54 PM

Post# of 198829
I'm sure the fact that info of a NDA was presented by someone representing ENZC in a small capacity may have them on edge. If share holders were damaged by actions that representatives of ENZC may be responsible for. May attach liability. If share holders actually can prove the damages then the fiduciary responsibility can attach liability to the officers of the company. If the officers of the company or anyone associated with them benefited from the events. Then it can be a much more serious issue that ENZC would have to deal with. The appearance of mismanagement is about all that would have to exist for the company and more importantly its officers to have a headache. I'm sure Charles being a highly talented and knowledgeable attorney would prevent that from happening. The company has had a previous deal taken off the table supposedly due to the Bulgarien ties. The good Dr. may have mentioned the NDA to Hicks. That may be construed as an issue but shouldn't be. Unless he mislead Hicks and no NDA was actually in place. Either way. The company will have to release a PR ASAP to look out for the interest of the companies share holders. The cold and flu season is coming as well as our new friend Covid saeson. I believe that whatever ENZC has going on will be announced in time to make a difference in the coming covid season. The fourth quarter is supposed to be the release of vet monoclonal antibodies. NOt sure how that will go with getting a partner and bringing that product or products to market is supposed to happen in such a short time period even with less requirements. I still believe in ENZC but am concerned with the possibility of liability for ENZC if they dont start to deliver in some way and SOON !!!!