InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,537.02
(
0.51%
)
US TECH 100
19,654.40
(
0.90%
)
Dow Jones
39,308.00
(
-0.06%
)
Brent Oil
86.42
(
-0.03%
)
Bitcoin
60,352.60
(
-2.70%
)
Post# of 447464
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Razorbucks

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 13
Posts 4198
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/17/2006

Razorbucks

Re: echos post# 61006

Friday, 02/09/2007 9:53:57 PM

Friday, February 09, 2007 9:53:57 PM

Post# of 447464
Echos, please explain your first specific "right".

Bush didn't establish a national religion by "faith-based" initiative. It's not the church of the United States ruling. Don't forget the constitution's context, England was ruled by the head of the church of England, the king. The church of England was the official state church (religion). It was like Sharia law. You'll have to compare US law to Sharia law if you believe you have an accurate point.

It's wrong to support variety of religions that expedite the helping of the poor? How is that establishing a religion? It's more like a myth by those that have a Jesus phobia.

I'll get to the rest if this discussion continues. However, you should post this as a reply on the NOWHINE board.



Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up