"If you add up the probable 50% for the lawyers and Bentham, 22% for Deirdre, 20% for Billy and $1 million plus 50% of the net remaining for the inventors, you are looking at around 98%+ spoken for by contracts."
Bentham's portion might have some meat coming out of the net to CBV/UOIP if it is found they were awarded more percentage stake based on personal loans to Deidre/Carter. The 22% for Deidre will likely go away based on the very weak position that contract is in. The 20% for Billy might go away based on excessive fraudulent activity. These are contracts that very likely include substantial fraudulent activity, which will be handled in court.
Not to mention, why would we go off of a number that has been coordinated the week of real action in the CA case to be released in effort to discourage further pursuit. This looks very surely to be by design, and why operate this way unless there was much more detail to hide? I'll make a wager there is a lot more on the table than $125 million when everything comes to light in shareholder discovery.
We have not been advised by opposing counsel, so to shareholders - that is hearsay. Not to mention, I'm not sure many of us would take advice from opposing counsel - they have shown they are very willing to mislead for their own strategy.
