InvestorsHub Logo

VC3

Followers 11
Posts 852
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/13/2018

VC3

Re: AllinFun post# 94974

Thursday, 06/02/2022 3:36:05 PM

Thursday, June 02, 2022 3:36:05 PM

Post# of 96905
I think ZW is actually referring to the last visible part of pg. 65, below the long (and mysterious) redaction.

"Q. And do you know what the -- the final
22 settlement number was?
23 A. Yeah, I do.
24 Q. And -- okay"

Then, on pg. 66:
"1 Is it -- is it a number that you're
2 happy with?
3 A. Well, you know, you never want to go
4 around second-guessing people. Obviously we
5 thought the number should have been higher. But I
6 was not in court while things were going on, so I
7 don't think I'm in the position to second guess.
8 But all three partners felt disappointed with the
9 number"

But we don't know the number....Earl says he does but doesn't share it. As you point out, $1 Billion would be disappointing if $3 Billion were expected. From long uoip's recent post, seems Bentham was expecting a large settlement as well. I can't imagine them folding for $100 million, can you?

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.