The problem is, I don’t need to offer sources to my information because I’m not proclaiming specific scenarios and events such as a lowball settlement. I’m relying on fundamentals of the case throughout its entire process.
1. The case took place over 5+ years through the PTAB process and then finally trial with ONE of the 13 defendants.
2. The defendants, after 1 full day of trial, gave up and conceded defeat as they had no realistic defense against Chanbond.
3. The valuation expert who’s testimony was accepted and included in the court had a very wide range, with the lower end being multiple billions of dollars in damages.
4. Carter and lawyers are holding the settlement/sale of patent financial information very close to their chest.
With all of these items, it’s pretty ridiculous to think there was a settlement lower than $100 million as has been proclaimed here time and time again. If the number was so low, again, why hasn’t Carter and lawyers leaked the information or made it public in order to discourage shareholders from further legal action which makes things much harder for them. Instead, they do the opposite and fight tooth and nail to keep everything sealed and heavily redacted. RED FLAGS.
Also, why did Carter and lawyers wait until the final moment when the defense gave up to decide, yeah let’s go ahead and settle for peanuts because you guys got us good. Laughable.
