In comparing reservoir depletion rates its important to distinguish between a. OOIP - Original Oil In Place, and b. Recoverable Oil, which is a % of OOIP
Without the water drive that Aramco is now using in Ghawar, the original recoverable oil was probably 15% of the OOIP (using primary recovery). The recoverable oil is now expected to be 50% of OOIP (using secondary recovery). So, the "reservoir" of interest (recoverable oil) could have increased by 3x simply with the use of a "secondary recovery" method, i.e. water drive.
The production rates at Ghawar are declining, which is evidence against abiotic recharging of the reservoir. With abiotic, the oil in place will be replenished and the production rate should be steady, or in the best case actually rise with time.