Wednesday, May 18, 2022 3:11:35 PM
As I mentioned in my last post to you (quote below) — this is exactly what has transpired in the Taieb case. Docket 1:19-mj-03192 was marked as terminated on May 16, 2022 — when the indictment was filed:
From my post:
About this statement from you:
Why would CATV be listed in a case filed in 2019, involving Taieb? Seriously, let’s stop this back and forth about this nonsense, because there’s nothing that transpired during the government’s investigation which predated the filing of the CATV investigation and affidavit in February 2021 that would be relative to this company, except what transpired LATER and with people directly connected and charged in the big case, allegedly perpetrating another fraud in CATV while under federal indictment, with the knowledge of the CEO. So, until there’s a new indictment you’re looking for something that doesn’t exist.
Having said that, since you’re stuck on this, I will very simply share why I think the two cases are very much adjoined at the hip…
3 of the people implicated in the CATV scheme (that we know of as a matter of fact) are part of the existing “big” case — those people are Dror Svorai, Michael Zoyes, and Yaniv Nahon. The agent overseeing the investigation noted in Svorai’s transcript that there’s a lot more to the case than what’s noted in the affidavit — but let’s put that aside for now…
It’s only logical since these people were already charged as defendant and co-conspirators in the big case, that the new charges against Svorai would be relevant to that case as to intent. I’m not sure if Dominic Falso who was a principle at CATV is also part of the big case as a participant (co-con/nominee), but I do know his relationship with Svorai’s criminal syndicate and Zoyes goes back decades. Let’s not forget Jorge Skolnick, who’s named as “individual #1” in CATV case, who did the books for CATV, also did the books for Svorai’s various scams for decades, as well as a portion of the 6 companies implicated.
Given this very simple explanation, is there a better chance of the cases being tied to the existing case, or not? Maybe — as I said in my last post, I believe it’s being used as leverage. What Svorai does in the big case will indicate how the government will proceed with the new charges.
Will there be a new docket #? Likely — depending on how Svorai proceeds in the case in progress (big case) (Ref. Taieb). Cooperate or not.
Does it make any difference for all intents and purposes? NO, IT DOES NOT!
Your only concern should be when will the government file an indictment, or better yet — when will Svorai decide to cut a deal. It’s really that simple. If we look at the big picture wide eyed, objectively and in perspective, then it might shine a light on what’s significant, and what’s just a waste of energy.
About this statement:
Again, of course they’re separate cases. I don’t get why this is so difficult. Taieb is a cooperating co-conspirator in the big case, he has nothing to do with CATV. He cooperated early on as soon as he was named in 2019. The answer as to why he’s getting a new docket is in your own statement, what you noted as interesting.
He is cooperating and therefore signed this…
” WAIVER OF AN INDICTMENT
I understand that I have been accused of one or more offenses punishable by imprisonment for more than one year. I was advised in open court of my rights and the nature of the proposed charges against me. After receiving this advice, I waive my right to prosecution by indictment and consent to prosecution by information.”
He cut a deal to drop 3 federal charges down to one count of a lesser charge, therefore he’ll be testifying against those named and unnamed in the big case, hence by virtue of his testimony he can not be part of the grand jury case, therefore the single count falls into a new docket. It’s advisable by counsel if there’s a iron clad case against a client, to not waste the government’s resources when there’s a plea deal and show cooperation by foregoing prosecution by indictment with a grand jury. Zoyes will likely have the same fate with his plea deal. Nothing rather interesting, since everyone knew he was cooperating. FYI — this is why it’s filed as Information rather than an Indictment.
I’ve already answered the following:
There’s no indictment yet — where are they transferring the case to? Lol you’ve answered your own question by providing a perfect example: Taieb’s indictment.
As for this one:
What evidence? The obvious? That CATV isn’t mentioned in an investigation that predated CATV charges, in an indictment filed for someone in a plea deal? Seriously? Your opinion is not evidence, neither is mine. Except you keep wanting to go back and forth about something that has ZERO relevance on the case or outcome. As I’ve mentioned in my last post, for the time being Svorai’s big case is our only window into the CATV outcome, therefore entirely relevant to those paying attention, and in particular OTCM. But, by all means if you have other elusive evidence please point us all to it, as I’m certain both OTCM and Feldenkrais would like to have a look, as his compelling evidence which he submitted months ago has only lead to a downgrade in their current status. Why were they downgraded a month after they filed their financials? Only positive outcome would be that OTCM reviews their latest financial in the 3-5 day review window and restores them to “pink current”. A miracle would be removal of CE before an indictment or anymore information is publicly released by the government, but heck, I’ve seen my share of negligence by OTCM, so it’s not out of the question.
About this:
What document? You seem to be under the impression that a federal criminal investigation, and corresponding law and legal procedure is just willy nilly and they can just file some piece of paper to appease spectators lol, however I believe the document you’re referring to is an indictment.
But, you’re still stuck in the “associate case” loop which means nothing in the grand scheme, UNTIL THERE’S AN INDICTMENT none of this matters.
From my post:
As for this:
Yes, thanks, I mentioned it a few days ago:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=168841356
And finally this:
I hate to beat a dead horse as you keep wanting to debate things that’s already been debated to death, but I pointed to the fact that the document you provided was from Svorai’s defense attorney and not by the government as you asserted, and the attorney was merely establishing cause for a bail hearing. It reflected ZERO evidence one way or another, as you proclaimed it did. I also explained that technically that docket is terminated, but you insisted otherwise, however the filings are very much relevant, but in your context it was not accurate. There was no glee, just pointing out a fact, and can we stop going in circles, over the same thing — over and over again, for the sake of those having to keep rereading a nonsensical debate, because I’m tapped out.
…And, to wrap this up… YOU have provided no proof that the two cases aren’t adjoined, whereas I’ve provided a coherent opinion above as to why they bear a valid relationship. See, we can both play this silly game, but how is this advancing the conversation or adding any value? I don’t know about you, but I for one don’t have the inclination to engage down an endless loop of irrelevance. In all seriousness — what difference does it make? Does the federal charges currently levied against Svorai involving CATV become any less serious? Does the relevancy of the two cases become any less/more abhorrent in the eyes of a shareholder? Does it have any bearing on the current state of the stock or potentially negative outcome? No, it doesn’t. It’s just a waste of valuable time which adds nothing of value to the conversation.
From my post:
.......CB
Recent CATV News
- Progress Report February 13 2024 • InvestorsHub NewsWire • 02/13/2024 04:25:04 PM
- Letter to Shareholders from 4Cable TV International, Inc. • InvestorsHub NewsWire • 01/05/2024 02:00:00 PM
- Small Cap Recipient of Military Drone Technology • InvestorsHub NewsWire • 11/20/2023 01:14:45 PM
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM