4Cable TV International Inc (CATV)

[starstx]

So CB ... Have you seen on the USA vs Vaccarro Case 1:20-CR-392 which os associated and includes case19:03190 and 03191 ... a notice was filed on 05-16-22 informing the Court of a related case Unites States vs Taieb 1:22-CR-248 ... and to have it transferred to them pertaining to their case. USA vs Taieb 1:22-CR-248 is associated with the 2017 to 2019 case and lists 19:0392.

This led me to look up USA vs Taieb and there was a new filing on 05-13-22 that lists the charges against Taieb (14 page document on Pacer) and the 6 companies in that scheme along with similar information in the previous indictments that occurred in the USA vs Vaccaro case. Who is not listed as one of the 6 companies in this document filed on 05-13-22? CATV. It is almost like they are completely seperate cases not related to each other. There is also a document indicating Taieb waived his right to prosecution by indictment and consents to prosecution by information ... interesting.

This further supports that the USA vs Svorai case which is 1:21-mj-02054 ... has never been requested to be transferred or that it is a related case to USA vs Vaccarro, Svorai and 4 others which is Case 1:20-CR-392 as referenced above.

This is more evidence to prove the USA vs Svorai case is seperate and not related to the USA vs Vaccaro case or the USA vs Taieb case which is being transferred per the court document submitted by AUSA Abreu that the Taieb case is a related case to the USA vs Vaccaro case.

Surely if the USA vs Svorai case 1:21-mj-02054 was related to the USA vs Vaccaro case as well ... AUSA Abreu would file a document that it is a related case to the court as well ... right? Right???

Oh and the court finally denied returning the inflatable so Vaccaro will not get access to the banana stand.

You enjoyed pointing out the one error I made citing the other document I posted that supports the cases are not related in that it was submitted by the defense attorney not the prosecution ... which makes no difference and nonetheless also points out that they are seperate unrelated cases and that claim was not contested by the prosecution. That case was transferred and documented in the court filings as being transferred to Case 1:21-mj-02054. The same case that has the transcripts you posted previously and obviously just as relevant but I digress.

Yet you have posted no proof to support your claim that CATV is the 7th company and been added to the USA vs Svorai case as you have claimed over and over. You still subscribing to that?