InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 44
Posts 13596
Boards Moderated 4
Alias Born 01/11/2004

Re: Poo28 post# 251161

Monday, 05/16/2022 4:36:45 PM

Monday, May 16, 2022 4:36:45 PM

Post# of 344803
Yes. VERY ODD. Waiting two years for DBMM to screw around only to "apparently" find out the company they were touting as a wonderful merge partner didn't meet the merger qualifications WAS DEFINENTLY ODD. And very upsetting to the shareholders who had invested their money on the promises of greatness that would happen.

Yet ANOTHER failed promise by DBMM.

But the ODDEST thing was when the company came up with another "wonderful" company to merge with almost mere DAYS after the original merger "failed". It was a company THAT WAS INVENTED. It was a SHELL put together to facilitate a closing in case the closing with the original merger company went bad.

I don't know the REA:L reason why all that happened, but it was obvious from the get go that DBMM strung along shareholders for two years (actually almost THREE years) and then at the end, they MADE up a company to merge with! It was completely ridiculous - but something I now expect from DBMM.

There's PLENTY of people still right on this board from when that happened, to be able to verify it!

I keep telling myself....deep breath....count to ten....try to answer without personal attack...if available, always try to present fact to back up your opinion.