InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 240
Posts 12161
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/14/2003

Re: None

Sunday, 05/15/2022 1:38:53 PM

Sunday, May 15, 2022 1:38:53 PM

Post# of 692413
When the likes of AdamF makes a clearly incorrect interpretation of what's happened in the trial I have no qualms about investors attempting to tell him so. On the other hand when a respected organization, like AACR repeats the allegation, then I believe it should be up to either the company or the lead clinician to explain why the allegation is untrue.

What's needed is to get AACR to clearly understand that what had been called progression in the trial was pseudoprogression. In the case of progression the cancer's getting worse, in the case of pseudoprogression the cancer's getting better. The determination that cancer was getting worse from those taking the vaccine needs to be overturned and a recognition that the cancer was getting better needs to replace it in the mind of organizations like AACR. Clearly it will not change in the mind of the AdamF's of this world as their entire goal is bringing down the company and until their goal changes, they won't listen to reason.

Individual investors shouldn't be fighting the battle with the likes of AACR, it should either be the company, or the clinicians running the trial that should set them straight. The AACR if they're acting professionally should write a retraction and set the record straight.

Gary
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News