One other point, LT - we know that ihub is monitored by opposing counsel, right? BA was even quoted in a filing....remember that? So, if opposing counsel is monitoring ihub and you and ZW are making plans to attend the latest hearing, they know you're going to be there and they know you will report back in here on ihub what happened and what your reaction was. And, such reports are appreciated - but - if opposing counsel knew that the redacted settlement amounts had led to pretty accurate guesses by shareholders and discussed here on ihub - and that you and ZW were attending the hearing and knew you'd be posting here afterwords, do you think they would intentionally come off in an aggressive, rude, off-putting way? Or would they make nice and try to give you false information to carry back and report? Opposing counsel are adeptly working toward a goal and that goal doesn't include paying shareholders their due.....their goal is focused on their clients interests and we aren't their clients. By introducing doubt about the size of the settlement here on ihub, they add to the sentiment that helping with legal action is wasted money. That's exactly what they want UOIP shareholders to think and believe because that helps them achieve their client's goals - and, once again, UOIP shareholders are NOT their clients.
AI
Market Data 
Markets 
