"...how the hell does WORLDWIDE NFT match WAX/Worldwide Asset eXchange? This is total fantasy that will be proven wrong."
A better question is how does any OBJECTIVE analyst (whose starting point in looking at a set of facts does not involve assuming nefariousness on the part of the acting party) look at
"Worldwide" NFT and "Worldwide" Assset eXchange and find no match and declare it a "total fantasy?"
Only a slanted and non credible analyst would arrive at a "non-match" conclusion here.
Go ahead and scour the world of established NFT focused companies worthy of a 3:1 forward split of GOFF with "Worldwide" in its name and you will not find any other company except for WAX.
George Sharp just recently deleted his Blue Ape tweet and reposted an edited version because, as he explained, he wanted to avoid any appearance of "trademark infringement."
Underneath that edited and reposted tweet, a follower praised George for always paying attention to the "details." George "liked" that tweet.
This the same George Sharp who, as the custodian of GOFF, announces to the world his renamed company will go by "Worldwide NFT" but in THIS instance George has no qualms about stepping all over the brand name of the ONLY NFT company there is with "Worldwide" in its name? And whose ceo has made innumerable public statements favoring a reverse merger mentality, rebellion against "the old VC model (which) has to change," and in synch with what George commented about "NFTs are so much more than apes or athletes?"
THAT was the ONE NFT company's logo keyword, "Worldwide," out of every other descriptor in the world that he COULD have chosen that he decided to pick?
I posted a long list of suggestions here once, including "universal," and "Top NFT" (though that could be confused with NBA Top Shot/Dapper).even "World" or "Global" NFT would'nt have been an exact match.
But no. George chose "Worldwide" and has stuck with it.
Meantime, over the past 11 months WAX's company focus has shifted markedly from blockchain to primarily NFTs -- on its YouTube channel WAX has renamed every one of its dozens of videos dating back five years to "WAX NFTs" -- even as George changed his initial GOFF focus of eleven months ago seeking a "blockchain company" merger to an NFT company merger, as revealed in January.
So how does the assumer of nefariousness process all this information?
"I still think the name was picked to generate interest in a hot themed merger."
If I could type what a game show's "incorrect" buzzer sounds like, I'd insert it right here.
George Sharp does NOT operate that way. You have veered offcourse, and down a rabbit hole when you make a non credible and WILD assumption such as that, that Sharp is engaging in fraudulent activity, knowingly falsely hyping his shell.
And from one wild, unproven, wholly inconsistent conclusion about George Sharp and GOFF we immediately jump to another:
"As I said I suspect it will be more of a holding company for varying blockchain type companies - like George has been doing with Forwardly. I don’t believe for a moment there was some handshake deal last year between George and Quigley..."
Whaaaaaat?
Based on what evidence?
A "gut feeling"? One that is clearly predisposed to believing that George Sharp is not who he claims to be and is misleading people to think GOFF is something it's not?
".. a holding company for varying blockchain type companies."
The true "fantasy" scenario is the above.
Banging one's head against the wall trying to figure out why George hasn't yet revealed the names of the incoming executives is futile because everything else is being kept strictly confidential before making the merger official to avoid exactly the false hype accusations alleged by seekers of nefariousness.
As happened with TSNP HUMBL.
People were guessing at that one also up to the minute before that merger was revealed.
Though George did tweet a hint at 6:30 a.m. before the 9 a.m. HUMBL news release, posting that consulting on the TSNP merger had been a "humbling experience."
But choice of words don't matter to George right? The same George Sharp who chose "Worldwide" four months ago and is good with it.
It was a much more difficult question last summer to decide which of Sharp's three tickers was the better investment.
This question of which NFT company GOFF is, is now a cake call.
AI
