InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 438
Posts 41282
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/07/2010

Re: QTRADERQ post# 43559

Saturday, 05/14/2022 9:16:15 AM

Saturday, May 14, 2022 9:16:15 AM

Post# of 69728
Well if that’s true, how the hell does WORLDWIDE NFT match
WAX/Worldwide Asset eXchange? This is total fantasy that will be proven wrong.


This is the application
https://formfiles.justia.com/pdf/official-federal-forms/0475/07.pdf
And explanation:
https://www.finra.org/investors/insights/corporate-actions-public-companies-what-you-should-know
Since the custodianship case was still opened and involved a issue with the shares - there was no way Finra could forward split those shares without knowing the actual share count.

I still think the name was picked to generate interest in a hot themed merger. How many reverse mergers can you think of that changed the name BEFORE they actually named the merging company?

As I said I suspect it will be more of a holding company for varying blockchain type companies - like George has been doing with Forwardly. I don’t believe for a moment there was some handshake deal last year between George and Quigley as described in this post:

So yes Logic 101 dictates the merger is WAX, based not on any "rumor" but the words from George's own mouth.

Remember his "if you didn't hear it from me.." tweet? Now that you heard it from him you dont believe him?

That's funny to me. I have heard and i believe him.

That said, I am as frustrated as any GOFF shareholder here that the GOFF-WAX announcementand merger itself has not been made official yet. And by the fact that until it is, no big run ln the stock is assured.
And because the apparent handshake agreement between George and Quigley dating back to last year could get blown up for whatever reason, until it actually happens. That's a frustration. And a continuing risk.”