InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 3726
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/03/2017

Re: imp82 post# 94473

Monday, 05/02/2022 2:38:09 PM

Monday, May 02, 2022 2:38:09 PM

Post# of 96910
Sure, that would be perfect. Let's do exactly what the opposition lawyers want us to do. Great idea! We start over in the Court of Chancery, where would be lucky to get a hearing date before they wrapped up CBV's case. Carter and Leane would throw some money at CBV to make it all go away and it would be over us. We would have no recourse at that point.

Why are people pushing advice from the opposition lawyers? Does that make any sense at all? Why is the opposition's counsel giving "free" advice to shareholders? If they are so concerned about shareholders' payouts, why haven't we been paid? The case against the 13 was settled last July (or June, who knows when -- I've heard both). It's been nearly a year now.

Dierdre has a conflict of interest with her arbitration award. She CAN'T represent UOIP. Not in Delaware, not in North Carolina (which by the way I don't believe has jurisdiction in this matter anyhow).
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.