One thing I honestly don't understand in the logic of his (?) presentation is that, if Chanbond is OWNED by Unified, and it is (I think, anyway), then an action by CBV against Chanbond is, by logical extension, an action against Unified. Or am I missing something?
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.