InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 46
Posts 4498
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/20/2015

Re: exwannabe post# 463463

Thursday, 04/28/2022 6:04:30 PM

Thursday, April 28, 2022 6:04:30 PM

Post# of 724263
That would be true that if we were tying to show that median survival was just slightly better with DCVAX say 2 months better like they did with the current SOC then completely agree not having a placebo control group randomly chosen from the full set of patients enrolled to the same criteria is problematic.

But that is not what we have here. There is such a eyepopping significant survival different between SOC and DCVAX it is no problem what so ever even if you discount a large number of the SOC historical population. you will still have a 2X - 3X overall survival improvement not 2 months but years of difference.

Again from the still blinded data on all 331 patients
https://nwbio.com/updated-interim-data-from-phase-3-trial-of-dcvax-l-for-glioblastoma/
Survival at 3 years is 28.2%
Sur
vival at 3 years for 41.1% (methylated)

The historical GBM SOC survival
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-68011-4#:~:text=%25%2C%20respectively36.-,Discussion,glioblastoma%20during%20or%20after%202005.
3-year survival was 11%,
and 5-year survival was 4%

The recent historical SOC GBM survival curves from many different sources are all pretty much dead on.

Men who are occupied in the restoration of health to other men, by the joint exertion of skill and humanity, are above all the great of the earth. They even partake of divinity, since to preserve and renew is almost as noble as to create.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News