I'm not sure why people think plaintiffs working on behalf of shareholders (whom certain shareholders refer to as the "cabal") should put everything out here "in the light" for Carter, Leane and CBV to see, while Carter, Leane and CBV file "sealed" and heavily redacted motions, and while some of those same shareholders have, or may have, information from the one of the other parties that they refuse to put out here "in the light" because, well "loose lips sink ships," it may be harmful that party's interests. Puzzling. It's all just so puzzling to me.
At any rate, the information Z is looking for is in the filings in Delaware, in unredacted and unsealed motions. It's all a matter of public record, and everyone has the same access to it, so I'm not sure exactly what the accusations are based on.
