All in all it is very sad to watch others using the LQMT IP, sign deals, grow revenues, after 5 years, 10 years, 20 years, while LQMT accumulates more debt, shuts down it’s own source for domestic manufacturing, shifts all manufacturing control to a source in China who also happens to be the majority shareholder. Conflict of interest?
It’s even more sad to read all of the excuses for their failures, when others with much less experience are succeeding.
Is it incompetence, fraud, lack of leadership, negligence, or am I missing much more due to a lack of communications or knowledge. How is it that LQMT is little known and yet the China companies at times claim that the brand name trademark of Liquidmetal means something? How is it they have managed to leverage the little known LQMT brand name and IP and the company that has the rights from Cal. Tech. Is still unknown or hardly known? How is it that they, the others using LQMT’s IP, are earning revenues and growing? How is it almost everyone invested believe at some point in time for years now that LQMT was/is on the verge of something big and yet nothing, absolutely the opposite has occurred? How is it the more this happens the more theories appear and nothing happens? And when i say nothing, I mean, very little!
What is stopping LQMT from copying the same marketing strategies for unknown products to become successful, that other companies have employed? They were handed $63.4 million dollars in 2016 and today they are still unknown!!! Yet other companies less known here in the USA are used as examples for amorphous metal success!!!
Gee it’s great to be ignorant and invested in a company that has made so much money for it’s executives and everyone else but it’s shareholders!!!
Can’t wait to read the next theory for success from any source. I need another laugh.
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Just venting off some steam before going over this years non-explosive 10K and anticipating the same for the first and second quarters.
