InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 143
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/30/2021

Re: satter post# 236555

Monday, 04/25/2022 11:51:41 AM

Monday, April 25, 2022 11:51:41 AM

Post# of 241039
The idea is they don't need new technology for the metaverse themselves. The "Metaverse" itself is a virtual world, and to access to this virtual world you need something like GestureTek has already, it is taking the input from what ever Gesturetek is already selling and just applying it to what ever they are using.

Basically, Gesturetek has a tool that you can take input from the user and give it to what ever that's taking the input from. Now, the user (engineer) can take that input and apply it to a game, program, or anything they want. It is not a pipe dream anymore because this is as close as it gets for something small in a big market to make one of their biggest moves yet, and again you still don't need any new technology.

If you compare the players in the article in that technology field, a potential investor lender might consider GestureTek/Eric to be the highest risk to be betting on for Metaverse, plus the bankruptcy could cause concern they do not have the financial means to support the technology. Yes you did not write the article neither did I, but you gave your thoughts on it. I shared mine.



High risk, High return. Everything is risky in the OTC, and I currently see WNBD as one of the smallest risky OTC companies out there (That's for OTC investors). Now when it comes to bigger investors, again I have seen OTC companies that I wouldn't invest a single penny in get tens of millions of funding for "speculative" technology.