Winning Brands Corporation (WNBD)

[satter]

It doesn't matter who invented it. The inventors don't just take their technology and leave a company if their invention is successful. Rights were reserved back to GestureTek when they sold that sector of technology. You do not share my enthusiasm that there will be this rush ti invest on a company that unfortunately failed because maybe you live in the past? Metaverse and VR world is being adopted and here we are getting an OTC company backed by a GestureTek, a company with real experience in the VR world saying "Hey everyone, we are getting into metaverse".

Also, how do you know they don't have any engineers left? Yes, the old ones left but they still have technology and can certainty get engineers to work on it and improve it.

Well sure it matters because who is going to invent new technology for Metaverse or create news tools.

But part of the point was there was no new creation since they left in 2011, no new Patents since and could be part of one of the reasons they eventually failed. Technology is something that changes along with other technology, improvement, advances, new products

I live in the present, and based on what I see currently. PR and what appears to me as a pipe dream at this point, does not move me, yet. It's fine, if it does for you. I hope I am wrong though. It will be fine if I have to say I was wrong. You see nothing stopped GestureTek from doing Metaverse and as you said they had the experience. So now Eric will.

I never said they don't have engineers left but I did say the Co founder left who was the computer whiz plus several top engineers. I posted a link to the patents. The co- founder is listed as the inventor on several. Mr. Vincent is not listed on any. Also with filing for bankruptcy it sure would be hard to pay for high priced engineers salaries. Eric should release details as we really don't know that status with employees. Its confusing as on the bankruptcy they list no assets and liabilities of $307,992. I do not understand why the IP or patents were not listed as assets. Not saying there is anything wrong but what is the explanation. The person at Bankruptcy Canada I spoke to did not know either and was complexed.

So, they declared bankruptcy but what does that have anything to do with what technology they have? If a company declares bankruptcy but still are good at what they do, does that make their technology any worse? No, and I didn't write that article. Whoever researched the gesture technology found out it was a big market with only a few players, and Gesturetek is one of them.

If you compare the players in the article in that technology field, a potential investor lender might consider GestureTek/Eric to be the highest risk to be betting on for Metaverse, plus the bankruptcy could cause concern they do not have the financial means to support the technology. Yes you did not write the article neither did I, but you gave your thoughts on it. I shared mine.

You don't know, I don't know either. So, why are you still questioning everything he is doing despite not even knowing what the plan is. It's like saying you don't like a cookie without even tasting it. Take it easy on yourself.

That's right neither of us the know the plan so I ask you why take that tweet with saying how amazing it will be, without knowing the plan. You take care, too