Again, if Dierdre presented the same information to the arbitration judge/panel that she presented for the TRO, and Carter didn't correct the record, then the info presented to the panel was incorrect/misleading, i.e., Carter was CEO of "Unified," Carter incorporated "Unified" in April 2014, there were 1 billion shares outstanding...
Also, wouldn't Carter have been acting beyond the scope of his authority representing UnifiedOnline, Inc. at arbitration?