InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 35
Posts 1073
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/01/2009

Re: austin01 post# 683426

Tuesday, 03/29/2022 11:40:13 AM

Tuesday, March 29, 2022 11:40:13 AM

Post# of 728611
As a broad strokes overview:

(Before I start, anyone that wants to elaborate or correct me, feel free. I am doing this off the top of my head and will likely need correction or at least clarification.)

VERY BROAD STROKES

The underwriters were considered a creditor to WMI once the bankruptcy occurred.

They were compensated for their involvement with WMI with stakes in the same trance (or class) as preferred stock holders.

There was a technicality in that the judge never actually approved part of the compensation as the underwriters were given extra time to decide if they would take their deal. 'Our' lawyer cut a deal with them after POR7 had been approved and apparently the paperwork never crossed the judge's desk.

Late in the BK, a lawyer filed a motion that they this was inappropriate and since the judge never signed off on it, was invalid. In that motion or a later motion (I think it was later), the same lawyer tried to get their claim moved to the same tranche (class) as commons.

The judge refused to do this for several reason. One was that it was too late to file such a motion (the term 'latches' has this connotation). The other was that the judge would have signed off on it anyway so 'no harm, no foul'.

That is it in a nutshell. Hopefully, by writing this, others will confrontationally correct me and you will get a better picture of the details.

Enjoy the show! LOL

DISCLAIMER: NO TRADING ADVICE INCLUDED - EVEN IF YOU THINK I AM A WEASEL AND AM SURREPTITIOUSLY TRYING TO SNEAK SOME ADVICE OUT THERE IS NO TRADING ADVICE INCLUDED - FURTHERMORE, THERE IS NO TRADING AVICE INCLUDED. ALSO, THERE IS NO TRADING ADVICE INCLUD

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent COOP News