Wednesday, March 16, 2022 3:47:13 PM
Flip a quick question.
There has been a lot of talk about Microden but very little about EDEN which is the large scale producer of DC's.
Here is some material I found regarding EDEN and MicroDen.
I would assume NWBO also owns the rights to EDEN.
If we are all aware of this please ignore.
From Article:
Correspondence: Shashi Murthy (s.murthy@northeastern.edu) Background
Dendritic cells (DCs) are effective vehicles for personalized therapies and there is substantial interest in leveraging their capabilities for improving patient outcomes [1,2]. However, the process of generating these DCs, typically from monocytes (MOs), in an efficient and reproducible process has proved challenging. We have developed automated closed systems, EDEN (large scale) and MicroDEN (small scale), for generating clinically relevant numbers of DCs from precursor MOs which can be sterile-transferred for downstream applications. These systems overcome many of the constraints of manual processing and are designed for the research environment as well as clinical manufacturing.
Methods
Enriched MOs were seeded into EDEN at a density of 206,000 MOs/cm2 using RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% HI-FBS and 500 U/mL IL-4 and GM-CSF (R&D). Medium was continuously perfused and immature DCs were harvested on Day 6.Enriched MOs were seeded into MicroDEN at densities of 200k, 400k, and 600k MOs/cm2 using CellGenix DC Medium supplemented with 350 U/mL IL-4 and GM-CSF (CellGenix). Medium was continuously perfused and DCs were harvested on Day 6.
Results
Flow cytometry indicated that immature DCs (iDCs) from EDEN exhibited standard DC-SIGN (CD209), CD14, and CD80/83/86 (Figure 2). Antibody expression is comparable to prior results collected in MicroDEN and well plate controls. Approximately 25 million viable iDCs were harvested from EDEN for an iDC yield of 32% with the relatively low seeding density. These results indicate that EDEN can be used to generate clinically relevant numbers of iDCs in a single closed system. Flow cytometry indicated that MicroDEN generated phenotypically similar iDCs at each seeding density with an iDC yield of ~30% (Figure 3), similar to well plate controls. Allogeneic functional assays indicated that MicroDEN iDCs exhibited improved proliferative activity than well plate iDCs and generally exhibited better activity at lower seeding densities (Figure 4).
Conclusions
DCs generated in both EDEN and MicroDEN are phenotypically comparable and exhibit increased proliferative activity to standard manual culture. Upto 26 million DCs can be generated by MicroDEN at the highest seeding density whereas the output of EDEN is 26 million DCs at the lowest seeding density.
There has been a lot of talk about Microden but very little about EDEN which is the large scale producer of DC's.
Here is some material I found regarding EDEN and MicroDen.
I would assume NWBO also owns the rights to EDEN.
If we are all aware of this please ignore.
From Article:
Correspondence: Shashi Murthy (s.murthy@northeastern.edu) Background
Dendritic cells (DCs) are effective vehicles for personalized therapies and there is substantial interest in leveraging their capabilities for improving patient outcomes [1,2]. However, the process of generating these DCs, typically from monocytes (MOs), in an efficient and reproducible process has proved challenging. We have developed automated closed systems, EDEN (large scale) and MicroDEN (small scale), for generating clinically relevant numbers of DCs from precursor MOs which can be sterile-transferred for downstream applications. These systems overcome many of the constraints of manual processing and are designed for the research environment as well as clinical manufacturing.
Methods
Enriched MOs were seeded into EDEN at a density of 206,000 MOs/cm2 using RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% HI-FBS and 500 U/mL IL-4 and GM-CSF (R&D). Medium was continuously perfused and immature DCs were harvested on Day 6.Enriched MOs were seeded into MicroDEN at densities of 200k, 400k, and 600k MOs/cm2 using CellGenix DC Medium supplemented with 350 U/mL IL-4 and GM-CSF (CellGenix). Medium was continuously perfused and DCs were harvested on Day 6.
Results
Flow cytometry indicated that immature DCs (iDCs) from EDEN exhibited standard DC-SIGN (CD209), CD14, and CD80/83/86 (Figure 2). Antibody expression is comparable to prior results collected in MicroDEN and well plate controls. Approximately 25 million viable iDCs were harvested from EDEN for an iDC yield of 32% with the relatively low seeding density. These results indicate that EDEN can be used to generate clinically relevant numbers of iDCs in a single closed system. Flow cytometry indicated that MicroDEN generated phenotypically similar iDCs at each seeding density with an iDC yield of ~30% (Figure 3), similar to well plate controls. Allogeneic functional assays indicated that MicroDEN iDCs exhibited improved proliferative activity than well plate iDCs and generally exhibited better activity at lower seeding densities (Figure 4).
Conclusions
DCs generated in both EDEN and MicroDEN are phenotypically comparable and exhibit increased proliferative activity to standard manual culture. Upto 26 million DCs can be generated by MicroDEN at the highest seeding density whereas the output of EDEN is 26 million DCs at the lowest seeding density.
Recent NWBO News
- Northwest Biotherapeutics Announces Establishment Of the Company's Own Dedicated Leukapheresis Clinic • PR Newswire (US) • 04/21/2026 01:30:00 PM
- Northwest Biotherapeutics Announces Establishment Of the Company's Own Dedicated Leukapheresis Clinic • PR Newswire (US) • 04/21/2026 01:30:00 PM
- Form EFFECT - Notice of Effectiveness • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/21/2026 04:15:08 AM
- Form POS AM - Post-Effective amendments for registration statement • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/16/2026 09:25:30 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/07/2026 04:30:50 PM
- Form NT 10-K - Notification of inability to timely file Form 10-K 405, 10-K, 10-KSB 405, 10-KSB, 10-KT, or 10-KT405 • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/31/2026 09:04:37 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/15/2026 10:06:20 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/02/2026 10:14:59 PM
- Form DEF 14A - Other definitive proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/28/2025 09:43:27 PM
- Form 424B5 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(5)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/25/2025 10:23:07 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/20/2025 09:26:03 PM
- Form PRE 14A - Other preliminary proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/19/2025 09:15:48 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/14/2025 09:44:21 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/31/2025 04:29:10 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/30/2025 08:40:05 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/24/2025 04:28:38 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/14/2025 06:22:26 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/14/2025 09:00:38 PM
- Form 424B5 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(5)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/01/2025 09:04:38 PM
