Digital Brand Media and Marketing Group Inc (DBMM)

[Jetmek_03052]

The Company’s resources in time and money has been negatively impacted by this matter dragging on unnecessarily following the Chief Justice’s Dismissal over two (2) years ago.....

A "dismissal" that NEVER TOOK PLACE because the Initial decision was NEVER FINALIZED by the SEC Board of Commissioners! Sooooo....if the Initial Decision was never finalized, how in THE WORLD can ANYONE say that any order of dismissal contained in the ID is valid????

Answer: They CAN'T!

.....and following full financial disclosure through the Super 10-K on May 31, 2018, available to shareholders and the public, then and going forward for the next four years.

A "Super 10K" (comprehensive filing) that SEC CURRENTLY regards as not being compliant because of the lack of interim 10Q financial numbers not being included (as rules regarding the formation of a comprehensive filing state must be included).

I mean REALLY - even the Board of Commissioners stated right in the granting of the PFR:

"Furthermore, Digital Brand has not shown that the material facts are indeed undisputed, including as to compliance with the requirements for reporting ICFR and those relating to the provision of interim quarterly financial information."

https://www.sec.gov/litigation/opinions/2021/34-90978.pdf