InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 26
Posts 4267
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/19/2020

Re: Achilles deFlandres post# 714087

Thursday, 03/10/2022 8:43:44 AM

Thursday, March 10, 2022 8:43:44 AM

Post# of 797362
You could argue Trump was following the presidence which was in place at the time pertaining to Watt. He most likely had legal council advising him on this, and probably felt challenging Watt's job to replace him was useless since Watt would be out due to his term limit before a case could make it through the courts to replace him. Look at all the molasses and mud type movement we've had on this (cases) with every court dragging their azz! It's beyond obvious to everyone involved that this is being controlled by a group. This last ruling to remand to the lower courts was yet another testament to the judiciary's obvious stonewalling. Taking all that time for a lousy 1 page remand. I know the decision had 5 pages, but 4 of them were useless spec'ing and drivel. Every time any case gets bumped for any reason, the judicial system is sitting on it like hatching an egg, rediculous.

Sweeney was one of the worst who managed to extend the case she was over seeing for years and years, to the point where she is almost retired. The media and pundits spun it as her giving government every oportunity to be fair to them, but she was helping them construct the current fiasco as we know it.