InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 40
Posts 1533
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/26/2009

Re: None

Sunday, 03/06/2022 12:39:10 AM

Sunday, March 06, 2022 12:39:10 AM

Post# of 198757
ENZC has spoken of and provided proof of its therapeutics being minimally or non-toxic and effective - for example, the lab rest results for ITV-1 that are widely accessible.

The Company is progressing to bring therapeutics to market this year and next year that will treat/“cure” infections from HIV, COVID-19 variants, and many other viruses.

The safety and effectiveness of available drugs and therapeutics are key variables to putting an end to this pandemic and permitting for the health profile of individuals to be taken into consideration both today and in the future. This creates trust and confidence.

In response to previous commentary about ENZC being late to the game, read the following:

CHD Says Pfizer and FDA Dropped Data Bombshell on COVID Vaccine Consumers

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/chd-says-pfizer-fda-dropped-205400826.html?fr=sycsrp_catchall

So much for the notion of peer-reviewed results, their importance, and the weight that many put on them. What’s the benefit of those peer-reviewed results if the drug/therapeutic that is released to market is touted as safe and effective and proves otherwise?

If ENZC is being questioned for alleged lack of transparency and shareholder communication, then what would you call an attempt by a NYSE traded company and the FDA to suppress data for 75 years? I call it criminal and unethical.