Agenda, agendas its always somebody with an agenda.
Surely no one believes that MSFT and RSA with myself and a few others included cooked up this pr to manipulate the price of wavx stock. Others would have you believe that this news was brought here by me with the intent to manipulate. Whatever. My long position has been staked out for awhile and I don't short and I aint buyin more so think what you want.
As to cm's argument that its only software. So what if it is? Lets look at this argument both ways, software only and hardware supported. If it is software only, as cm contends, then most here would agree its and inferior solution. Does that mean it won't be used, accepted, or purchased? Inferior solutions gain market share all the time. Just remember, ITS ALL POLITICAL. Take a look at RSA's secure chip portfolio and tell me there is zero possibility that this id management solution cannot be integrated with hardware. The possibility exists and is probable in my opinion.
Doma, as to your assertions, why did wavx buy sign-on-line? For the same reason MSFT and RSA are touting a single sign on solution for id management. Ask Becker if MSFT gets it?
The fact is, and I stated this two years ago, piece by piece, the wavx trust system can be built using components already in the market place owned by the competition. Oids, when presented with this argument always fall back on the TAN which is one of the easiest components to replicate. The trick was getting hardware to the edge. The center will remain in the firm grasp of the big boys. Don't get me wrong, I believe wavx still has an awesome value proposition, but in selling the idea many secrets were exposed and as a consequence being copied.
My opinion is that there are many here who only like positive dd and tend to label anything the competition does as manipulation and scare tactics. Those are the people who will lose the most money when things go wrong.
zoomer
AI
