I haven’t read the board since this posting really, so I can only gauge response based on a naysayers reply to me. What she is doing in my mind is beginning to demonstrate that DCVax is so much part of every solution that it need not even be mentioned sometimes. Oh, of course they got DCVax (it is my standard of care).
I don’t see her fumbling to find words on the topic of FDA as a negative indicator, but understand why some could She knows she must be super careful. Let’s face it, the demeanor of the other expert speaks volumes. Welcome to our home, can I throw the first punch from your left flank?
She let out some sensitive info immediately. She confirmed what I consider SAP discussion where FDA did not reply by 30 days… consider they had presubmission meetings with Q&A and feedback and that should make everyone rest a little bit easier.
After that, I doubt she has any information other than submission status which she basically also confirmed embedded within the disappointment of not knowing an answer. I am reasonably confident that she would not be kept inside the loop on other actions beyond that, as they are super confidential and she is not an officer of the company. Physicians make clear to us their independence of mind and body. There are many reasons not to share information.
Yes, she is disappointed. Yes, he too seemed frustrated, but was he frustrated that he couldn’t pry information from a hmmmmm friendly rival? I think as a lead question it says a lot. The reply must be put into context.
