Marjac, respectfully, I can not find any plausible justification such as controlling the calendar and finality of Judgements as a proxy for giving fraud priority at any cost. A man sits on death row for 10 years, and later evidence is discovered that shows the prosecutor falsified evidence that was relied upon to convict. But, wait, in the interest of preserving the order of the courts, we'll just have to sacrifice the innocent victim as collateral damage for the greater cause, protecting the system.
John McGreevey received his PHD from Hopkins in the field of biochemistry, and an emphasis on bioweapons. He is a 25 year FBI intelligence agency veteran, who came out in late 2020 as a whistleblower. He is now running for a Senate seat representing Maryland. He said, he has first had knowledge, including hours of tape recordings, finger prints, as well as other evidence to the following: Rod Rosenstein and his dirty tricks squad out of Maryland HQ were single handedly responsible for capturing and compromising 25% of the Fed Circuit Judges using blackmail, often fabricated, and various unspeakable horrific tactics.
How can anyone believe the rule 36 wasn't called in by the bureaucratic Mafia with this information in hand?
I listened to your oral arguments 9 plus times. There's no way honest judges would knowingly take a pass on Fraud. They should have taken your second option. These people are heritics. Rule 36 is convenient, because they had nothing meaningful to write against your solid case, which was fully, unequivocally, supported by case law.
ILT
