The 8k is proof of the contract. The manufacturer supply agreement with yihao was necessary because the PLA with yihao/eontec specifically EXCLUDES consumer electronics. (Think about it—No manufacturer supply agreement was needed for zyris, martin guitar, etc. Why? Because the PLA already contemplated non consumer electronics.) therefore an agreement had to be put in place to protect Liquidmetal and its assigns (Apple) because this IS a consumer electronic part and the PLA does not contemplate the manufacturing of consumer electronics or their parts. The agreement with yihao and the 8k were absolutely necessary and could not be avoided. Apple Watch. The emails from a yihao employee stating that they are in “mass production” of “Liquidmetal die cast parts” for the “Apple Watch” are clear proof—those are the exact words she used. Exact words. (And she gave samples of colors using the Liquidmetal logo.) There’s more DD to support this in addition to what I’ve typed here, but this is enough for you to think about now. You literally have several emails from yihao sent to two different people and an 8k manufacturing supply agreement with a 5 year commitment. If you can’t see that this is revenue for Liquidmetal from the Apple Watch and manufactured by yihao (and others) then you just aren’t reading it correctly. Don’t get caught up in the “what ifs”—read the emails. We have never had direct proof in this way—ever—now you do, backed by an 8K. Enjoy your super stock-LQMT. Now, if you reply, stick only to what I’ve typed here—if you can refute this with facts and actual DD from real sources then I’ll reply—stay clear of opinion without backup data (as I have). If you go down a second or third path without addressing what I’ve typed here first, I won’t reply because it will then be a waste of my time—I’m not chasing red herrings today.
