InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 27
Posts 3206
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/05/2021

Re: foxhound02 post# 443652

Sunday, 02/13/2022 5:50:10 AM

Sunday, February 13, 2022 5:50:10 AM

Post# of 717759

It really does not take that much time. Major journals require a 2-3 week turn around from reviewers. A reviewer can say they cannot do it on time. They just get someone else. A major revision should take at most a month unless something is so bad it requires going back and doing more work. Months delay---no.



well... you said it... according to Vubru, working in the field of medical publications, a peer-reviewing like this one should not take longer than 6 weeks. DI has stated that the article is in peer review end of Nov which would land us beginning January. Exactly the time period I have heard through my sources they expected the publication.

also... if the journal publication is to deter shorts from attacking topline data would it not have been, with all this time behind us after data lock, much smarter to go straight for approval and skip the disclosing of topline data, the submitting of BLA, and any journal publication until after the approval is in? I mean an unexpected announcement of approval would have shut up shorts more than a publication or at least equally so right?

So what the F is going on here?

NWBO management not seeing the urgency here is nuts.



Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News