InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 46
Posts 1364
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/09/2015

Re: None

Wednesday, 02/02/2022 3:44:12 PM

Wednesday, February 02, 2022 3:44:12 PM

Post# of 469799
RSBQ by itself as an endpoint has been criticized by experts. So, has this had any influence on the FDA? Is the FDA looking for something more in conjunction with RSBQ than in the past conduct of Rett clinical trials?

“…experts took issue with RBSQ as it focuses too heavily on behavioural changes at the expense of physical improvements. They are calling for better efficacy endpoints that are more quantitatively and objectively sensitive for real-world value.

Current outcome measures in Rett syndrome clinical trials lack the sensitivity to measure nuanced changes in disease progression, experts say. Without more sensitive endpoints, ongoing Phase III trials could struggle to objectively quantify symptom improvement.
….

Physical biomarkers and more objective physical symptom measures would improve the sensitivity of Rett syndrome clinical trials, Fagiolini adds. Objective measures could detect more subtle changes in disease progression than human-based assessments, she explains.”

See this:

Need to know:

Rett syndrome is a progressive neurological disorder in young girls. Two ongoing Phase III trials use Rett Syndrome Behavior Questionnaire (RBSQ) as a primary endpoint. This validated 45-item checklist assesses behavioural and emotional symptoms in Rett syndrome.

But experts took issue with RBSQ as it focuses too heavily on behavioural changes at the expense of physical improvements. They are calling for better efficacy endpoints that are more quantitatively and objectively sensitive for real-world value.

Current outcome measures in Rett syndrome clinical trials lack the sensitivity to measure nuanced changes in disease progression, experts say. Without more sensitive endpoints, ongoing Phase III trials could struggle to objectively quantify symptom improvement.

Two Rett syndrome candidates—Acadia’s trofinetide and Anavex’s ANAVEX2-73—anticipate data from their respective Phase III trials this year. As a coprimary endpoint, both trials use the Rett Syndrome Behavior Questionnaire (RBSQ): a caregiver-focused checklist measuring behavioural and emotional symptoms.

While RSBQ is a validated endpoint, it does not adequately focus on important motor function outcomes, University of Alabama Rett Syndrome Clinic director Dr Alan Percy says. Rett syndrome is a rare neurological disorder characterised by progressive loss of balance, speech, and motor function.

A more holistic outcome measure would better emphasise Rett syndrome’s physical manifestations, including walking and hand use.

“It’s a decent scale for behaviour, but it does not meet the level of rigour that a good outcome measure should meet,” explains Percy, who is an investigator in both Phase III trials. A more holistic outcome measure would better emphasise Rett syndrome’s physical manifestations, including walking and hand use, he adds.

The 45-item RSBQ consists of eight subscales: general mood, breathing abnormalities, hand behaviours, repetitive face movements, body rocking and expressionless face, night-time behaviour, fear/anxiety, and walking/standing. But it can weigh behavioural outcomes too heavily at the expense of physical symptoms, Percy says.

Research is underway in animal and human models to validate new Rett syndrome biomarkers and endpoints, Harvard Medical School neurologist Michela Fagiolini says. These could prove more sensitive to subtle changes in a disease that is long-term and progressive, she explains.

Focus on physical symptoms lacking

Based on existing data, both trofinetide and ANAVEX-73 appear to improve attention and social interaction, Percy says. Among ambulatory patients, some have shown a greater interest in walking, he adds.

But RSBQ is too heavily weighted toward standard behavioural measures, and not enough toward physical capabilities or “adverse behaviour” such as breath holding and hyperventilation, Percy explains. In open-label trials so far, neither asset has shown any apparent improvement in these physical outcomes, he says.

The 187-patient Phase III LAVENDER trial of trofinetide (NCT04181723) and the 84-patient Phase II/III EXCELLENCE trial of ANAVEX2-73 (NCT04304482) share the same RSBQ coprimary endpoint. The LAVENDER trial’s co-primary endpoint is the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scale, while the EXCELLENCE trial’s is incidence of adverse events. CGI is a “reasonable” physician-based outcome but other parent- or caregiver-based assessments should run alongside it, Percy says. Both trials have placebo controls.

Physical biomarkers and more objective physical symptom measures would improve the sensitivity of Rett syndrome clinical trials, Fagiolini adds. Objective measures could detect more subtle changes in disease progression than human-based assessments, she explains.

https://www.clinicaltrialsarena.com/analysis/rett-syndrome-endpoints/
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AVXL News