InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 14
Posts 306
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/17/2021

Re: iryokabu post# 368055

Sunday, 01/30/2022 1:25:43 PM

Sunday, January 30, 2022 1:25:43 PM

Post# of 426480
The likely strength of MITIGATE trial ...

... lies not in its Primary Outcomes or even its Secondary Outcomes, but rather in its tertiary outcome measures. If you put 2000+ people at cardiovascular risk on Vascepa and compare them on the below measures with a similar group not on Vascepa over a 6-month time frame, I believe it is likely that there will be significant differences among these measures. That would be a win for Vascepa independent of the viral URI data. And there was after all, 5 times as much MACE incidence already in the combined groups shown in June presentation as there was mod-severe viral URI (and twice as many hospitalization in combined groups for worsening heart failure hospitalizations as there was incidence of mod-severe viral URI).

Other Outcome Measures:

1. Percentage of participants who die due to any cause [ Time Frame: 0-12 months ]

2. Percentage of participants experiencing a major adverse cardiovascular event [ Time Frame: 0-12 months ]
Death due to any cause, hospitalization for myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for ischemic stroke

3. Percentage of participants experiencing an expanded major adverse cardiovascular event [ Time Frame: 0-12 months ]
Major adverse cardiovascular events, hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome, and coronary revascularization (i.e., percutaneous coronary intervention and/or coronary artery bypass graft)

4. Percentage of participants who are hospitalized for heart failure [ Time Frame: 0-12 months ]

5. Percentage of participants who are hospitalized for any reason [ Time Frame: 0-12 months ]

6. Percentage of participants who have an emergency department visit for any reason [ Time Frame: 0-12 months ]
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMRN News