InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 90
Posts 17418
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/06/2006

Re: Nick119 post# 437949

Sunday, 01/23/2022 2:13:15 PM

Sunday, January 23, 2022 2:13:15 PM

Post# of 701945

Hi team - can you all provide some feedback on this post? I was trying to capture the significance of Dr. Stupp's advisory role with NWBO for the less-diligent/informed investors:


Well, if you believe most of the long posts here then Dr Stupp is eveil incarnate.

He cooked the books on the Optune trials he was PI on.
He stayed quite for years on NVCR's overstated claims on long term OS
He allowed patients to be tortured with a useless chemo
His financial interest in NVCR caused him published an opinion saying the 2018 JTM paper was pointless as it had no unblinded data.

OK, that is what the many longs thought a week ago.

IMO, it shows what everybody knows. It is not about taking sides. R Stupp was never anti DCVax-L. His only comment on it was the 2018 paper lacked real data. And his agreeing to providing advice twice means nothing more than that.

The idea that all investigators take side is childish. The vast majority want to advance the science.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News