InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 34
Posts 7651
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 09/29/2011

Re: downdraft post# 36643

Tuesday, 01/11/2022 9:32:56 PM

Tuesday, January 11, 2022 9:32:56 PM

Post# of 39829
MAXD claimed to be a "co-owner" of the ODT patents in a lawsuit against Google, and that courts found MAXD did not really have the ownership it claimed to have. That's why MAXD lost its lawsuit against Google.

That is why MAXD owes Google $820,000. The courts decided MAXD's patent claim was so preposterous, that the whole lawsuit was frivolous.

That is why CEO Greg Halpern and ex-CEO John Blaisure owe Google $820,000. Both of them are so inept they did not even read the contracts they signed before filing their joke of a lawsuit frivolous lawsuit.

Court rulings are more reliable than any 8-K. An 8-K is an attestation of fact by an executive (in this case, a dishonest executive). But a court ruling is a finding of fact by an expert, impartial observer.

This so-called "co-ownership" ruse was started 8 years ago. In all that time it has completely failed to do anything except sell MAXD shares to foolish people.

I can understand why MAXD promoters are trying to get more mileage out of the "co-ownership" scam. They have made a lot of money tricking people with it and they will keep trying to trick more.

For interested investors, they can read the 8-k's, where they'll find the agreement between MAXD and the company who holds the Optimized Data Transmission portfolio of patents, of which MAXD has co-ownership.