Thursday, January 06, 2022 11:56:41 AM
If you read the en banc majority ruling re: unconstitutional remedy closely, the 9 judges who ruled against vacating the NWS claimed to do so because President Trump wasn’t opposed to the NWS as one of their main points so they believed only prospective relief to be appropriate… This rationale is completely disproven by the recent Trump letter as well as the fact that the ruling was written in September 2019 and the admin promptly ended the cash payments of the NWS shortly after the ruling was released with the Trump picked Calabria/Mnuchin duo in charge. How can those 9 judges square that ruling with the Trump letter and SCOTUS instructions re: shareholders being entitled to retrospective remedy if Trumps agenda was aggravated by the unconstitutional provision?
Trump and SCOTUS have given the greenlight to the conservative judges to rule infavor of shareholders like never before. the long wait is over. the 5th circuit en banc WILL deliver. in Willet we trust
FEATURED Element79 Gold Corp Reports Exceptionally High-Grade Results from Lucero • May 14, 2024 7:00 AM
Avant Technologies Equipping AI-Managed Data Center with High Performance Computing Systems • AVAI • May 10, 2024 8:00 AM
VAYK Discloses Strategic Conversation on Potential Acquisition of $4 Million Home Service Business • VAYK • May 9, 2024 9:00 AM
Bantec's Howco Awarded $4.19 Million Dollar U.S. Department of Defense Contract • BANT • May 8, 2024 10:00 AM
Element79 Gold Corp Successfully Closes Maverick Springs Option Agreement • ELEM • May 8, 2024 9:05 AM
Kona Gold Beverages, Inc. Achieves April Revenues Exceeding $586,000 • KGKG • May 8, 2024 8:30 AM