InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 63
Posts 5520
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/09/2009

Re: pantherj post# 63118

Sunday, 12/12/2021 2:24:51 AM

Sunday, December 12, 2021 2:24:51 AM

Post# of 80706
This is a joke right? Powerful lawyers? First of all there’s one lawyer representing SA and I know her personally. She couldn’t give a compelling argument to a bedtime story. Have you seen her filings? Laughable. Have you seen her court record? Not good. The cases she closed in September, she’s humiliated. The links I posted before tell the real deal in court cases and yes there is case history.

As for what you and SA disagrees, who cares? It really doesn’t take a genius to figure out SA has no legal standing. I re read the mediated settlement and the federal case was named BY NAME and BY CASE NUMBER I’m paragraph 2.

Ok, set that aside. Have you seen the ACRA case posted? ACRA went after SA hard in this case. His reasoning exposes to the public now that SA and his associates released MW from ANY further court cases in federal and state courts.

Combined, those are deal killers. I spoke to a legal professor who was also a federal judge. Here’s a quote: “if SA waltzed into my courtroom with this, him AND his lawyer would face serious sanctions.”

And lastly, ACRA did dismiss his case, but only dismissed their case “without prejudice,” (according to court records) meaning Schaefer has the right to intervene again immediately. I’d say Schaefer is waiting to pounce for violating their agreement, which is clear in their filing.