InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 63
Posts 5520
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/09/2009

Re: pantherj post# 62909

Friday, 12/10/2021 8:48:01 AM

Friday, December 10, 2021 8:48:01 AM

Post# of 82120
I’m afraid it’s quite relevant. I see very serious criminal liabilities here for SA.

These documents controvert everything you’ve posted about the federal case. These cases were amalgamated and by virtue of ACRA purchasing the judgement, SA has no legal standing. If he is making an attempt to reopen the federal case without standing, that is grounds for fraud. You posted a while back, just after the judgement was bought that “Schaefer should offer more for the federal case.” Question I now have is “why,” he already owns it? And further, there’s an entire section that by my read releases all parties from “double dipping.” This is in fact a release of any further legal action