Friday, December 10, 2021 8:48:01 AM
These documents controvert everything you’ve posted about the federal case. These cases were amalgamated and by virtue of ACRA purchasing the judgement, SA has no legal standing. If he is making an attempt to reopen the federal case without standing, that is grounds for fraud. You posted a while back, just after the judgement was bought that “Schaefer should offer more for the federal case.” Question I now have is “why,” he already owns it? And further, there’s an entire section that by my read releases all parties from “double dipping.” This is in fact a release of any further legal action
ECGI Holdings Announces LOI to Acquire Pacific Saddlery to Capitalize on $12.72 Billion Market Potential • ECGI • Jun 13, 2024 9:50 AM
Fifty 1 Labs, Inc. Announces Major Strategic Advancements and Shareholder Updates • CAFI • Jun 13, 2024 8:45 AM
Snakes & Lattes Opens Pop-Up Location at The Wellington Market in Toronto: A New Destination for Fun and Games - Thanks 'The Well', PepsiCo, Indie Pale House & All Sponsors & Partners for Their Commitment & Assistance Throughout The Process • FUNN • Jun 13, 2024 8:18 AM
HealthLynked Introduces Innovative Online Medical Record Request Form Using DocuSign • HLYK • Jun 12, 2024 8:00 AM
Ubiquitech Software Corp (OTC:UBQU) Posts $624,585 Quarterly Revenue - Largest Quarter Since 2018 • UBQU • Jun 11, 2024 10:13 AM
Element79 Gold Corp Files for OTCQB Uplisting, Provides Financial Update • ELEM • Jun 11, 2024 9:25 AM