InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 14
Posts 306
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/17/2021

Re: ziploc_1 post# 361608

Tuesday, 11/30/2021 5:45:26 PM

Tuesday, November 30, 2021 5:45:26 PM

Post# of 427316
If only Du could've known non-significance on cropped-table

... EPADI (and Ziploc) argue, then it would have made a world of difference

The two bottom lines cropped from the table indicated that the difference in APO-B between the active and passive arms of the Kura study was NS (i.e.non significant) ... This is what made the cropping so important for judge Du's decision in favor of obviousness.



How will the judicial system ever back their way out of this corner? What would Hikma's defense be if they actually ever needed to provide one? How is the appellate court going to view this evidence of fraud? What is the likelihood that Judge Du could understand the "cropped" table without knowing that the significance levels were calculated using student's unpaired t-test?


https://www.investorvillage.com/uploads/87669/files/Table3-cropped-notcropped-highlighted.pdf
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMRN News