InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 8
Posts 274
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/24/2020

Re: MiltonTonic post# 45048

Friday, 11/26/2021 10:58:06 AM

Friday, November 26, 2021 10:58:06 AM

Post# of 62894
The captain already addressed this

Quote: First of all, these said RESTRICTED shares were not "giveaways". I had this great idea to "read the filings" and found that these RESTRICTED shares were almost entirely for SERVICES PROVIDED. This is indicative of having "provided a service". I've been invested in GRPS for quite some time now and happen to be aware (through formal due diligence) that Dr. Goulding's sons (Blane, Bryce, and Brenton) have all likely done work for the company (i.e. SERVICES PROVIDED). Then there's folks on there like Bruce Bond and Sam Elias. Giveaways? I trust most people would agree that being a key contributor to creating the formulations for both "Dr. Bond's Gummies" and the "PLEX" line of nutraceuticals counts for "SERVICES PROVIDED" by Dr. Bruce Bond (current head of R&D for GRPS). Sam Elias, current Chief Revenue Officer, was likely the one who helped broker the current pending government contracts (i.e. SERVICES PROVIDED). Certainly, Goulding isn't fit to facilitate such an incredible opportunity, right? He's not even fit to be the CEO, right? LOL! The other names on that list that also show SERVICES PROVIDED probably.... get ready...... provided services at some point to GRPS. What are the details of some of these services? Can't be sure, but my guess is GRPS didn't just "give" shares because they thought it would be fun. They issued shares in exchange for SERVICES PROVIDED. Services we may soon hear about. I didn't see a marketing company on that list... and yet, there is a new logo and splashpage video that we can probably safely assume was created by someone other than Dr. Goulding. Is it possible that there were RESTRICTED shares issued to a named person on that list in exchange for those SERVICES PROVIDED? I'm not going to hit this subject further, as it's apparent these RESTRICTED shares were issued on account of SERVICES PROVIDED. And they don't mean squat to the investor base because #1 They take at least one year to mature from the time they were issued. #2 They would need to be accepted by a brokerage firm from the GRPS transfer agent (good luck). And #3 IF they met the maturation period and IF they successfully found a firm willing to accept them, they would be constrained by the 1% rule.... i.e. they would only be legally allowed to sell extremely small amounts over three month periods (i.e. making "dumping" completely impossible).