Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[lettruthringout]

Maybe, just maybe ...

Amarin's non-participation is the result of corporate covering up of negligence

... Amarin was unwilling to support Rule 60 because they didn't want to be associated with conspiracy theorists and unsubstantiated claims of fraud. Maybe they didn't want to associate the Amarin name with a lawyer that filed a ridiculous judicial misconduct complaint against a judge for the offense of uttering the words "fish oil" in a newspaper interview. Maybe, if EPADI had had the good sense to focus on 'mistake' (ala Curfman) and leave all the hyperbolic claims aside, maybe Amarin would have supported the Rule 60 motion.

As a shareholder, I might have considered my own suit for incompetence if the company had stupidly stood next to a table only missing "P of intergroup differences was calculated using student unpaired t test" and said "Your honor, we agree this cropped table represents a fraud on the court of the highest order." If EPADI wants to go down this rabbit hole, no one should expect Amarin to follow them. There are legitimate reasons for criticizing Amarin. Not associating itself with a judicially-embarrassed shareholder's unsubstantiated claims of fraud is a plus and not a negative.