InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 7
Posts 103
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/06/2007

Re: psykotik1 post# 32642

Wednesday, 01/31/2007 6:09:00 PM

Wednesday, January 31, 2007 6:09:00 PM

Post# of 162847
I agree with your assessment. The terms of the financing agreement preempts the need for FCCN to dilute the float...instead, it issues 144-shares to GGI. FCCN raises the money they need to bring the shell into compliance without having to bloat the float on the open market.

If FCCN needs a little more capital to get the shell ready for merger, all they need to do is pay GGI $1.00, get $10.00 back in a mandatory stock purchase, and issue 144-restricted shares out of escrow at a quasi-market price. This is a win-win for everyone. The other option for FCCN is to sell shares on the open market…bloating the float…destroying investor value. GGI has provided FCCN with a creative line of credit…without which, FCCN would not have the resources to complete the clean-up.

I still maintain that the float is about 60M shares…not 140M; remember, the 83M shares recently issued to GGI are 144- restricted shares.


Just the musings of an old duck hunter from NH…Justin.

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.