InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 53
Posts 5678
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/28/2014

Re: None

Monday, 11/08/2021 10:13:10 AM

Monday, November 08, 2021 10:13:10 AM

Post# of 48984
It appears it was a company consultant who threatened the legal action so why did he not proceed? Suvorov, a public official seemingly with ties to ACRL, never stated he was going to sue but the consultant did. It is all duly noted, time stamped and filed, and some of it has been provided to the SEC. I did notice the early ACRL geo's being lauded here were paid in shares and they were the boots on the ground guys in 2019, and their decades of experience and the relevance to ACRL drill programs going forward, and it was about their experience, were lauded by many. They may have walked when they realized no cash was coming, just shares they could not sell at the time so why would they continue working? Their shares of the Preferreds, likely contravened the cease trade order according to staff at the OSC and ASC. They would have no material effect on the cease trade order removal yet would continue to rack up costs against the reality of likely never being paid for their services. All of those years of experience in 20 countries cannot simply be dismissed as having made a mistake in assessing their suitability for the job at hand. Maybe choosing a guy to run the company with zero mining experience was also a mistake then he made a mistake and so on ad infinitum.