InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 21
Posts 635
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/08/2018

Re: None

Sunday, 11/07/2021 5:25:07 PM

Sunday, November 07, 2021 5:25:07 PM

Post# of 425772
Marjac

Just on the point of Du stating POSA did not consider K

Is there anywhere in trial record any reference to this ??

For example did counsel go the generics ever state/ submit
that POSA had not considered K ?

Did their expert ever say in evidence to the Judge that POSA did not consider K ?

How did DU reach this understanding as To POSA not having considered K ?

If this was planted by the generics it adds a great deal of further colour to the fraud ??

Thus Planting the notion to Du that Posa had not considered K but that Du could and thus could correct the failure of POSa

Alm
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMRN News