Anavex Life Sciences Corp (AVXL)

[nidan7500]

LBSR

RedShoulder - I interpreted your statement of "That's a $713,493 bet on good news ahead"

Maybe we should start looking/seeing/thinking on a different(much bigger) scale.

IMO, we are waiting for trial results to validate (read : to help us understand -prove w/confidence) that certain results are reproducible and therefore must be true. But, the big unknown-unknown at that point is "SO WHAT"?. Where does it go-lead us. The immediate payback $$$ is great but, then what?

IMO, Dr.M. probably knows what is next but the rest of us need to start really pondering where this is going and what it means to us, B/C it is-WILL go somewhere after MOA validation. That knowledge (where does this go next??) is worth considering. What is outside the box, B/C that is what will be moving us next.

I am reminded of the semiconductor industry and what started in the 60's and blew up quickly to become the WW telecommunication-high tech knowledge business escalation process. This all happened b/c someone developed the diode based on planar technology (almost by accident).

We went from vacuum tubes to transistors, to multiple transistors on PWB to integrated circuits (chips) to bigger chips, from glass rooms to desktop distributed processing, to high speed ww comm, to satellites..etc. . Entire industries-WW then followed w/in a short period of time. All we have to do is GET IT RIGHT AND PROVE IT, and we think that is about to be shown.

IMO, that is about where we are w/this knowledge base. Dr. M. and the AVXL team are working to ensure the facts are clear and that the results will always be validated when the science is done in a certain manner.

So, stand by, we are about to validate (prove by provision of objective evidence and fact based reasoning ) that AVXL MOA claims are valid.

Not to dramatize this point in time but I would suggest that we have no idea what AVXL is really worth, and neither does WS...BUT IT IS A VERY BIG NUM.

Just hide and watch, b/c we have all been through this before. BUT, IMO this time it (change) will likely move faster than historical rate of change precedence suggest. All the best.